Last night, my intentions for this post were to write a flippy and funny post about Sue Johanson's appearance on The Hour (or as I said to a friend "George is having Sex with Sue on The Hour tonight!"), but all that changed while watching George's interview with Sgt. Debbie Bodkin.
Sgt. Debbie Bodkin is a member of the Waterloo Regional Police Service, but in 2004 she travelled to Darfur to interview the survivors of the conflict (or more accurately the genocide) and get an idea of what's going on for the United Nations. That was three years ago. And nothing's changed. Why?
I think the thing that got me about this interview is that there are so many people who want to do something, who want to affect change, who want to give the people of Darfur a better life free of conflict, but as much as they try, they can't. What also hit me is how much our hands are tied if we want to make a change. The fact that Sgt. Bodkin, a member of a respected police force and a part of a volunteer United Nations team, would receive a form letter from her government representative dated three days before she wrote her letter blows my mind. Three f***ing days. And it wasn't even addressed to her (it said "Dear Constituent") What blows my mind even more is the fact that this conflict has been going on for years and years and it's not a deep, dark hidden secret... everyone knows what's going on, but yet nothing's being done on the International stage to stop it. Why?
And it's not like there are individuals who don't care about the people of Darfur... there are many Canadians, high-profile or not, that want to make a difference. People who want our government, our elected representatives, to use their resources and put a stop to this ongoing tragedy. But it's not happening. Why? Aren't Canadians known on the International stage as Peacekeepers intent on helping other nations in need and giving others the same basic rights and freedoms we enjoy here in Canada? Isn't that one of the reasons we're in Afghanistan? Isn't that what Romeo Dallaire tried to do in Rwanda, even when most of the International community turned their back on him and his mission? Shouldn't we live up to Lester B. Pearson's example and make a difference, not through war or aggression, but through Peacekeeping and humanitarian effort? Pearson won the Nobel Peace prize in 1957 along with the admiration and respect of the International community for his suggestion to create a United Nations Emergency Force (which eventually became the Peacekeepers) to diffuse the Suez Canal Crisis? Why aren't we living up to that example and using everything in our power to make a difference to the people that need it?
I don't wear rose coloured glasses, I know that Canada is not perfect. We have our own litany of problems and issues that need to be resolved to take care of our own people. But you know what? Generally, we have it pretty good. Or at least have the opportunity to have a pretty damn good life. So if we're sitting pretty, enjoying the benefits, rights and priviledges that come with living in Canada, why aren't we doing more to help others in the world who don't have those basic human needs and a chance to a better life? What can we do? What should we do? Beyond donating money to relief organizations, is there anything else we can do?
Well, maybe there's one thing. I don't know if it would work, but something is better than nothing. Sgt. Debbie Bodkin wrote to her member of Parliament and got a form letter back. What if we all wrote a letter to our local MP asking for action from the Canadian government to help the situation in Darfur? Not that I think that people haven't written letters to the government to ask for action in Darfur, I know people who have written many letters. But maybe, just maybe, if we all do it, maybe the government will see that the Canadian people, as a collective whole, want them to act. That we want them to stand up on the International Stage and say enough is enough. Something needs to be done. And something needs to be done now.
6 comments:
From what I understand about Darfur... China had guns but they need oil. Darfur had oil. It thinks it needs guns. They are not evolved enough to realize they don't need guns.They don't need to fight each other.
China sees a market... Other counties need China so they don't get in the way or that market...That is why the UN is doing nothing. Hey why don't people sue weapon manufactures?
Didn't George say something like... "No, country or western country is going to invade a Muslim country?"
It never ceases to amaze me that doing the right thing is at the bottom of a long list that usually starts with greed, but, it seems most of the time we never get to the bottom of that list...
I LOVE writing my politicians, no problem there.
This is my opinion - to put the onus on the government to step to action is a very slow route and not as productive. Anyone who has worked in a government job, knows how slow it is to get things done. It has to go through so many levels of approval. The government is years behind the progress that the public can make on it's own. It's not to insult the government, it's just saying alternate routes may be more fruitful.
Take the environmental movement - the government is so slow on this and it's the small businesses, independent groups and individuals that are making the huge leaps in innovation and change. This is where to look for change - do it independent of the government, then the government will possibly catch up way down the road.
So for things that need change, people can come together, raise funds, educate themselves as to the best solution, and go for it. Then tell everyone what you're doing to inspire more of this. This seems like the most effective way to get what you want. And besides, if you're passionate about an issue, taking it to an innovative level is very rewarding.
WE NEED TO REMOVE THE INNOCENT FROM THE VIOLENCE...there are too many evil people in the world, more then there are good. Unfortunately.Here in Canada too! More to tell in the near future.
What exactly is it that you expect the Canadian government to do? Yes, it is excruciatingly heartbreaking that humans are suffering to the degree that they are in that country. But is the Canadian government qualified to sort out the madness of every individual's murderous mind more then you? What types of effective social programs can the Canadian government draw from that would bring the Janjaweed into harmony with others? And, if Canada were to take a physically defensive role, well...violence begets violence, and then what? But what I really do not understand is how does it got to that point. Like why does that not happen to us in Canada? Because we have evolved to a point where we can put locks on our doors? The world is just so complex, I cannot wrap my head around it!
It is hard to get your head around, isn't it.
A good friend has been to Africa twice to monitor programs sponsored by Rotary. The problems are so complex. But, the one thing she has said... North American solutions are not always the best ones.
Post a Comment